Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nevertheless, it's the most important metric for many of the edge cases > under consideration. Questions of intent can only be resolved with > difficulty, and it's possible a judge may come to the wrong conclusion; > but I think any other framing of the requirement results in a license > that would in some cases *require* a judge to find for the "wrong" party.
I agree that intent is a very useful metric. It's wrong to say that it's only "resolved with difficulty", instead, it's regularly proved in the criminal courts every day.
