On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:33:12PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 14:03, Mark Rafn wrote: > > I'd far rather live with the loophole and accept that some people will > > make money by running a program with unpublished changes. > > Of course, the issue is not money. The idea is that users of a program > ought to be able to get the source code for that program. Users these > days often use a program without ever having recieved a copy of it.
People that telnetted in to central servers, I think, fell into this category even then. > Nobody thought of this in 1991. But times are changing.
