*not speaking for FSF* On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:54, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I agree that that's a reasonable and canonical interpretation of '4'. > My concern is with alternative interpretations of it, given that some > people here are advocating quite liberal stretching of the term > "interactive" to accomodate PHPNuke.
I don't think this is a stretch. > I'm wondering what the consequences of such elasticity are for other > parts of (2)(c), and how anyone can justify applying such elasticity to > one part of (2)(c) but not any other part of it. Which parts are being considered inelastically, by whom? -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
