On 14 Dec 2002 03:08:03 -0500 Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Part 8, I'm sure, will cause problems - it has in the past, but I > > can't remember in what context; it may just be that some zealots > > made some hubub a while back that. I don't really recall. > > I can't manage to google out those objections (except in one really > obscene case), and I wonder what this clause even means... > > Can I have French law, as interpreted by the courts of the County of > Fairfax, Virginia, USA, if I sue?
Good point. I think the objections might have been from wording like, "in the case of any dispute, it shall be resolved in the courts of <such and such a jurisdiction>". > > However, Part 2.1 is a serious concern. "You have the right to copy > > this work of art of your personal use, for your friends or any other > > person, by employing whatever technique you choose." Reading the > > original French, this is an accurate translation. As far as I know > > (and other more knowledgable people should comment), this goes > > against DSFG #6, "No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor". The > > license seems to prohibit copies for non-personal use. > > Non-personal use such as...? AFAIK, corporations are considered > persons by law. In addition, even if this didn't give permission, > section 2.2 give me permission to redistribute, which I think would > cover it. Non-personal use such as commercial use. :) P.S.: Please do not CC: me on replies, I'm subscribed to the list. I'm surprised you haven't been flamed to death for it already by other people ;)
pgpvUkuEQbwye.pgp
Description: PGP signature
