Lars Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem with GPL'ing is that anyone who recieves a PS file using a > GPL'ed font could then claim that the PS file in its entirety must be > GPL'ed and thus request to get the (.tex or similar) sources for the PS > file, since these would be "the preferred form for making modifications".
If the font is really separate: that is, if the encoding is done in such a way that it's easily extractable, then it clearly seems like a case of a mere aggregation.
