On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:03:11AM +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote: > a) to improve LPPL (which has several deficiencies) > b) to come to a common understanding that LPPL-x is complient with DFSG as > well as FSF etc or failing b, b2) determine why the LPPL fails the DFSG, and what can be done about it.
Don't assume a license is DFSG-free because you've read (or written) the license, read the DFSG and ticked off each guideline. Human judgment and existing practice come into the equation. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
