On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 12:19, David Carlisle wrote: > If the command the latex uses isn't called latex then basically all bets > are off and it can produce anything at all.
This is, I think, the most crucial part of this whole discussion. I did not see any statement to this effect in the LPPL draft that was posted here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00007.html I would love to hear that I had completely missed it, or that you've changed the draft to include such a statement. It's my belief that if a statement to this effect were added to the license, then there would be no question as to the license's compliance with the DFSG, either as it is or with DFSG 4 removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
