On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 05:47:20PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote: > These are nice goals, but they do not make free software. Debian's > definition of free software means that it satisfies the DFSG. > Whatever your motives may be, if your program doesn't satisfy the > DFSG, then it doesn't go in main.
And that is what it all comes down to. I also have sympathy for some of the goals of non-free licenses, but they are just that... non-free. In all of the work people have done on the LSB, we made decisions early on to enforce the trademark of the name "LSB" against a written specification, rather than to make portions of software non-free. (Given that most of the software was already written and free, it also wasn't much of a choice.) -drew -- M. Drew Streib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Independent Rambler, Software/Standards/Freedom/Law -- http://dtype.org/
pgpKtm7tAhLfG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
