On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:17:53PM -0700, Richard Stallman wrote: > > That is unacceptable because it would allow modified versions of the > > GNU Manifesto. > > =2E..but not modified versions that carried the FSF's endorsement (unless > the FSF decided to do so), > > I understand that, but this won't be enough to make sure our message > gets through.
I hope you'll forgive me if I do not see why this is the case. I do not see what aims are not served by having a complete, unadulterated copy of all Invariant Sections in every copy of a GNU Manual. > You and I have stated our views on this well enough, and I don't have > time to repeat mine. We may as well agree to stop arguing about this. Some day, when you have time, I'd appreciate it if you'd take a moment to explain to me how the FSF's message doesn't get through when you have a guaranteed platform. > Debian will eventually make a decision. I'll do my best to expedite the process so that we don't have this ambiguity in our application of the DFSG milling around any longer than it has to. Thanks for your time. -- G. Branden Robinson | Communism is just one step on the Debian GNU/Linux | long road from capitalism to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | capitalism. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Russian saying
pgp26bgUHdBTI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
