LGPL. It sounds like what the LGPL was written for. Of course I'm just the guy who likes to argue :)
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > >ladspa.h is code, and the API specification of a plugin API, >and currenty does not have a display of what license it is distributed under. > >People in the <linux-audio-dev@ginette.musique.umontreal.ca> list >are discussing what license to distribute it under. > >What should be the best license to suggest ? >It's used in some GPL programs. > >-- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer >GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4 > > > -- FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you! Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
