On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 05:44:49AM +0200, Adi Stav wrote:
> Is this really the issue, or is the issue the fact that modifications
> cannot be copylefted? Consider a license very similar to BSDL, except
> that it contains a clause saying that you can distribute binaries
> under any license you like, but source code (modified or not) must be
> distributed under the BSDL. Such a license would give all users equal
s/the BSDL/that license/
> rights, but also ensure that you have no way to prevent your
> modifications from becoming proprietary binaries.
- Adi Stav
