On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Raul Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 04:56:50PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: > > The full source code to the binary created does include the source > > code to Qt, yes. (without Qt, the binary cannot be compiled (headers) > > and linked dynamically (direct object code and associated symbols) > > > > I cannot fathom how this could be a point of contention; it seems > > blatantly obvious to me. > > I must agree with Joseph that this is an issue. After all, Troll objected > to the (now inactive) Harmony project using Troll header files for their > Qt clone.
I apologize, my question about the definition of complete source was something of a dude. After posting it I realised the definition wasn't the most important issue and that is why I didn't follow it up. I do feel that the definition of complete source in the GPL could be clearer. Again I apologize for asking an unnecessary question. BFN, Don.
