Seth David Schoen wrote: > Henning Makholm writes: > > > Caspian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I'd just like to state that if anyone out there is interested in making a > > > completely, utterly free software GNU/Linux dist, with a license that > > > prohibits putzen like those at Corel from pulling the sort of nonsense > > > they've been pulling, > > > > Note that you won't be able to include any GPLed software in your > > distribution if you want to make restrictions about how and when > > other people or corporations are allowed to redistribute it. > > Where does the GPL say that? I can give you several examples of distributors > who have made this their regular practice.
? If you don't own the code that is GPLed, you can't relicense it under a different license. How could you then use `a license that prohibits putzen like those at Corel from pulling the sort of nonsense they've been pulling' if the GPL allows it? Peter