On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 07:58:17PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > > (We just saw an example of what to fear with BIND: its BSD license > > > allowed modifications under more restrictive licensing conditions, > > > so the upstream maintainers are now putting out the new version > > > under a non-free copyright). > > > Well, nothing in bind was exactly under a license which would prohibit > > this, was it? > > No - which is the problem.
The license I am after is one similar to the LGPL, but limited to Free Software (DFSG definition) instead of allowing use with ANY software. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Oryn> anyone know if there is a version of dpkg for redhat?
pgp524dpGfayQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
