Performing thread necromancy.... Josh Triplett wrote:
> There is a strong case for Fair Use of the imagery based on the latter > two factors. The actual use of the imagery in the game is also > more-or-less a parody, which is a protected right. > > Nevertheless, as you said in your previous message, these rights are > (unfortunately) not universal. Do we know what the "worst" jurisdiction's laws about this are? I know that the UK has a much more limited "fair dealing" right. Are there jurisdictions with even more limited rights? I think virtually every jurisdiction has some sort of "quotation for the purposes of review" exception, though I could be wrong. What's the worst case we actually have to care about? This would be a good thing to know. :-) -- This space intentionally left blank. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
