On 5/17/05, Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A court can rule on whether a contract permits or forbids an action > without addressing the question of what the action later implies.
I agree. Then again, as an example of a copyright case where contract law was held to be irrelevant, consider Huston v. La Cinq Cass. civ. 1re (28 May 1991). -- Raul
