On 5/17/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But when someone does so -- as the drafter of the GPL has done > -- I think a court should have no difficulty in acknowledging the > licensee's right to have it construed narrowly if he or she so requests.
I agree -- especially since it's the grant of license which is being construed here: If it's construed narrowly, this simply means that the licensee wasn't granted license for that case. [Clearly, the question of whether or not license is needed is a separate question.] -- Raul
