Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I'm following this thread -and some other- but is not so easy to > >understand it completely - right now I am studying the desert island > >test...;-) > There are better ways to spend you time, these tests are not based on > the DFSG and so are not much relevant.
I think that's overstating it. Those tests look DFSG-based, but there doesn't seem to be good current documentation on how they relate to them. > >I don't know if cc.org will be happy to change their licenses to make > >them (or at least some) dfsg free. > You should also note that it's not at all obvious that the CC-BY and > CC-BY-SA licenses are not DFSG-free, notwithstanding the objections from > a few vocal debian-legal posters. "DFSG-free" is not the default choice. There seems to be problems and I'm not yet convinced the licences follow DFSG. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
