On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:38:21 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm too tired to dig up the exact reference, but in a large heated > discussion between Hans Reiser and many other people on d-devel last year > (or maybe the year before) about removing or obscuring credits in > mkreiserfs, Hans Reiser stated that he had information from RMS that there > would be some sort of "invariant section"-like clause in GPLv3. FWIW, RMS later posted to the list[1] stating that Hans was mistaken: "Reiser's statement was inaccurate. For GPL version 3 we are considering requirements for preserving certain limited author information in the source code, and making explicit that other GPL-compatible licenses that are present on parts of the code cannot be removed from the source, but nothing beyond that." [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/06/msg00173.html -- Andrew Saunders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
