[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>> You are missing the obvious point that the debian-legal consensus is not
>> the definition of freedom for Debian. So yes, I think that this
>> consensus has a limited value.
>But there's a difference between holding something in little value and
>attempting to reduce it's value by destroying it.
So, exactly who do you think is trying to destroy debian-legal, and how?

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to