On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:40:10 -0500 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I've already explained how this relates to the DFSG, despite the DFSG > not attempting to exhaustively list non-free restrictions.) I understand that the DFSG is a Guideline, those guidlines are open to interpretation, and debian legal is seen as the authoritive place to interperate the DFSG in new or changing conditions. An extract of clause 1 of the debian social contract states... "As there are many definitions of free software, we include the guidelines we use to determine if software is "free" below" For debian-legal to abide by Debians Social Contract, i think someone should be attempting to "exhaustively list non-free restrictions". I think a vote should be required, and the DFSG changed before debian-legal assumes the right to impose any new restrictions. Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
