On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:50:16PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > If a large US corporation violates my copyright license, I'm likely to > stand a significantly better chance if I can sue them in the UK. To some > extent, I think it comes down to intent - if people are introducing > these clauses with the desire to restrict people's behaviour above and > beyond the terms of the license, then that's non-free. If they're doing > it in order to make it easier to enforce the terms of the license, then > I think the situation is less clear.
I think I agree on this point. If the license is otherwise DFSG free, it's more likely that choice of venue would be used to deal with "Foo, Inc. is stealing my code by not releasing the modified sources" than with "Smith, J. is figuring out what my sup3r s3krit code does, and telling people about it". -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
