Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Fri, Jan 21, 2005:

> Do you suggest removing from the archive all packages whose licenses
> impose uncommon restrictions or just this one?
 In this software the problem is two folds, some parts of the software
 are clearly free, and some other parts are a fork of some code under
 APSL 2.  Which leaves two options: rewriting the non-free part, or
 splitting in two packages, one for contrib and one for non-free.

 I think some software was already built on the libs provided by this
 package[1], so it is not trivial at all (indirect dependencies make
 some packages depend on it via the shlibs mecanism).

 Which makes me wonder whether APSL 2 is acceptable for non-free?

   Regards,

[1]
bee% grep-available -FDepends libhowl -sPackage
Package: gnome-terminal
Package: gnome-gv
Package: nautilus-cd-burner
Package: libgnomeui-0
Package: galeon
Package: libhowl-dev
Package: howl-utils
Package: libgnomevfs2-common
Package: gnome-games
Package: epiphany-browser
Package: gnome-pilot
Package: gnome-session
Package: libgnomevfs2-0
Package: libgnomevfs2-dev
Package: totem-xine
-- 
Lo�c Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to