Walter Landry writes: > Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As has been explained on debian-legal, the interpretation you propose > > would mean that the GPL is a non-DFSG-free license. > > Where was that? I have seen no such convincing explanation.
Eclipse compiled against Kaffe and distributed separately would not violate the GPL: the compiled verison of Eclipse would not be a derivative of Kaffe. If distributing them together violates the GPL, then the GPL contaminates Kaffe in violation of DFSG #9. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
