On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, SCOTT FENTON wrote:
> AFAIK, if it needs payment for commercial use, then it's discriminating
> against commercial use, isn't it?
[Snipped beginning of thread....]
Well.... That is the problem I ran up against; the Anti-Discrimination
clauses in the DFSG. That is why I am asking here.
So, to the "brass tacks". Is requiring payment for commercial exploitation
considered 'discrimination' WRT the DFSG?
And remember, I am new at this non-GPL licensing game. So I'm asking from
naivete, not stupidity. ;^)
Cheers!
____________________________________________________________________
/ Clay Crouch, Shamless Bum ;^> | <http://danno.tzo.com/~danno> \
| Linux Administration/Consulting | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| Debian Package Maintainer | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| "Away put your weapon; I mean you no harm." -- Master Yoda |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1024D/7D2AD631: 2319 2356 FEDF 4631 63F3 762A E443 1C2A 7D2A D631 |
\____________________________________________________________________/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
