According to Joseph Carter: > Okay guys, how about a few suggestions? Well, you could use the term "OSI-Certified Open Source" as an unambiguous description of open source licenses. (Unless you don't like OSI's certifications, of course.) -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Chip Salzenberg
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording..... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Brian Behlendorf
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Joseph Carter
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording..... Brian Behlendorf
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wordi... David Starner
- New Apache license compatible with GPL? (... Mark Wielaard
- Re: New Apache license compatible wit... David Starner
- Re: New Apache license compatibl... Mark Wielaard
- Re: New Apache license compatible wit... Brian Behlendorf