Florian Reitmeir schrieb: > On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Ralph Plawetzki wrote: > >> Florian Reitmeir schrieb: >>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Ralph Plawetzki wrote: >>> >>>> Well, this is a good idea to not have different times in the two >>>> operating systems on a dual boot machine, but leads to incorrect >>>> interpretation of time-sent stamps in e-mails. The MUA will show time >>>> stamps that differ the amount of time the set UTC on the machine differs >>> >from the real UTC. >>>> Unfortunately I've got no solution for this problem on dual boot machines. >>> ????????????????????????????????????? >>> >> You did not get my point. > i think i did > >> Lets assume I would follow your suggestion and change the time on the >> linux part of a dual boot system to the actual local time by using „date >> -us“ (you call UTC „system-default timezone“). In this case the UTC >> on the system would be stored in the RTC and windows would have the same >> time. > > _no_ thats nonsense > and the conclusions too. > > please read, chapter: "Clocks in a Linux System" > > man hwclock >
I know that this is nonsense. I followed your thoughts and described what you said above as a scenario. Ralph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
