Hi Tim,

Thanks for your help.

2007/8/7, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > ok, I'll try that this evening. That is to say, I already run an
> > unstable debian, so I don't know if your procedure is still necessary
> > (sorry, I forgot to tell that I run a debian sid in my previous mails).
> >
>
> On sid, you don't have to do any of the kernel recompilation.  Things
> should "just work".
>

Unfortunately, it doesn't ;).

I already did this. This is a nice little program and I followed all
> > suggestions (most of them forced me to recompile my kernel), but this didn't
> > change anything.
> >
>
> Did Powertop show any frequency scaling going on, or was your system
> permanently running at its full frequency? You may want to try it with the
> Debian kernel again - it never asked me to recompile my kernel, and it did
> manage to find that frequency scaling was turned off.
>

All what Powertop says is to configure some properties to scal down the
processor wake-ups; which I did. An info message also says on top of the
powertop window that no power management information is available.
The system is scalable though; I managed to scal down the processor's speed
as I wish; but no battery detection.
What is wiered is that the power management applet detects whether or not
the system runs on battery or not; but no time left estimation and no power
management of the battery is available; it simply says battery or not
battery.

I think, I should work and I forgot either to load an acpi module (which
would surprise me; acpi_cpufreq, ac and battery are loaded as well as
governors) or the power management program I use is not able to manage this
type of battery (I tried cpufreqd, powersaved, powernowd and powertweakd).
What do you think?

Is this still to test since I run a debian sid? Can it be that the power
> > management works well on testing and not with sid?
> > Btw, I tried the 2.6.22 precompiled kernel from sid too, but it did not
> > work better.
> >
>
> No, sid should work as well as (if not better than) testing.  I'm
> wondering if this is just an issue with the very newest MacBooks (I have a
> first-generation one, and it works fine). You shouldn't have to recompile
> the kernel in any case with 2.6.22.
>

Yes, perhaps; mine is a second-generation macbook. Perhaps I'll have to
wait.

Where can I go from there?
> >
>
> One thing you could try is adding acpi_cpufreq and cpufreq_ondemand to
> /etc/modules.
>

This was already the case

 That may enable frequency scaling if its disabled.  Also, make sure all the
> ACPI-related packages are installed by running "tasksel" and making sure
> "Laptop" is selected.
>

This was already done at install time.

Alex

Tim
>
>
>

Reply via email to