Ofcourse. You are right. Dunno why I said that! Thanks for pointing it out.
-bakki On 3/31/06, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bakki Kudva wrote: > > > Just a side note. I am amazed how well Sarge unstable runs on this > > machine which was made in 1997 and has a PentiumII with 384MB of RAM. > > It still boots relatively fast and and for most development work > > (emacs, ruby, rails) it is fast enough. > > There's no such thing as "Sarge unstable". > > Sarge is the current STABLE release. > > http://www.debian.org/releases/ > > Uprgrading to unstable took you to another version, if that's what > you're saying you did. > > If you upgraded to unstable recently, you're now running "Sid". > > Nate > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
