also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.04.08.1434 +0200]: > You'll have to move cards around or remove them.
So I do that until the info screen just after the BIOS shows them all to have different IRQs? > No. nmi_watchdog=1 means IOAPIC, nmi_watchdog=2 means LAPIC. You > need to have the NMI Watchdog compiled into the kernel. This is my problem. I have looked around the LAPIC stuff and in the Watchdog section, but there is nothing about an NMI watchdog. I have enabled the Hangcheck timer and the Software watchdog. also sprach Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.04.08.1440 +0200]: > Also, to reinforce what others have said about hard drives: its > got an Enermax 360somethingorother that cost me about USD$55. > I bought it after my 400w USD$20 ps went bad. Just wouldn't boot > one morning. I use Enermax almost everywhere. also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.04.08.1631 +0200]: > > I believe this is wrong. Lithium-Ion Batteries actually suffer from > > complete discharge cycles. > > Any references? This is an important topic. Mh, I will look this up again. AFAICR, it was on the Dell website. However, I just found this, and it makes sense: http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-34.htm: A lithium-ion battery provides 300-500 discharge/charge cycles. The battery prefers a partial rather than a full discharge. Frequent full discharges should be avoided when possible. Instead, charge the battery more often or use a larger battery. There is no concern of memory when applying unscheduled charges. > If you never mucked around with anything in the northbridge, then > you're using whatever the manufacturer thought best. If it is > a well designed board, and it didn't use crappy capacitors from > some industrial pirate or black market components, that won't > reduce its expected lifetime any further (because it is already > computed in the expected lifetime). If the board can handle it, > but it is not as stable as one might want, try disabling the > feature. Google search for it, and "man setpci" for more details. Thanks, I will look into this too. I really appreciate the stuff you write, Henrique -- it gives me confidence again, and it'll be invaluable in the archives. I wish I knew half as much as you did about this stuff. also sprach Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.04.08.1712 +0200]: > >How? In 2.6 kernels I can't find an option... > > You can pass apic=off or noapic on the kernel command line. > If you reconfigure the kernel it is in "Processor type and features > ---> [ ] Local APIC support on uniprocessors " As far as I understood, this is the Local APIC. Since I see nolapic and noapic in the kernel boot parameter list, I assume they are different, or at least one is a subset of the other. It seems impossible to control whether APIC is used other than with the boot parameters. As I said, I tried all combinations of APIC, LAPIC, and ACPI. None of them fixed the problem. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
