-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
On Saturday 17 August 2002 3:34 am, Bill Moseley wrote: > So my question is why (or when) would I need to install ALSA? Is there an ALSA is considered to be the future of sound card support on Linux. It was meant to be merged into kernel 2.3 ready to be stable in 2.4 although that didn't happen; however it _has_ been merged into 2.5 so should be stable in 2.6. > advantage of using it in my case when sound seems to be working fine? No necessarily. I used ALSA on SuSE 7.3 because it was the default system there and set up my (ancient) ISA Awe 64 without fuss. I used it initally on Debian because I couldn't be bother to remember how to get OSS/Free working. Unfortunately I had various problems with Quake engine games (the sound in Quake 2 was useless, and there was annoying noises when starting up Return to Castle Wolfenstein), and then when I tried using ALSA 1.0 rather than 0.5.something the thing refused to work due to undefined symbols. I went back to OSS/Free. After a bit of messing in /etc/modulels.conf my sound card works perfectly. My advice: if it works, don't touch it ;) - -- Cheers, Chris Howells -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP key: http://chrishowells.co.uk/pgp.txt KDE: http://www.koffice.org, http://edu.kde.org, http://usability.kde.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9XemdF8Iu1zN5WiwRAnR8AJ93n2ajfgGQgAs/wXgg9GZa5Cqh+gCbB2da uqzoew2wRfSuL09sBVo9Q74= =TkbA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
