On 02-Mar-28 23:01, Ralf Hein wrote: > The whole idea > about releases should maybe be put on discussion, because nobody is using a > 'stable' for daily use. Linux is evolving to quickly to ever be able to > release a stable _and_ up-to-date (in terms of features and hardware-support) > distribution. IMHO there should only be two 'releases', both of which to be > constantly updated: a testing (cutting edge) and a normal (stable enough) > version. After all, what's the point in running a XFree 3.3.6 with let's say > 800x600 when one could run a XFree 4.1.xx with 1024x768, even if this crashes > sometimes?
On my laptop I run testing. On the servers I operate I run stable. Who cares about X? But I do care about occasional crashes, or an apt-get upgrade that actually breaks things. Gee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
