Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I upgrade pcmcia-cs to pull in the newer applications (cardctl > v3.1.31) and in that process ended up with this problem. > > In the past 2.4.xx kernels I have been using the kernel supplied > drivers for my network cards. Is it safe to assume that the problem I > have experienced was limited to the fact that I also upgraded my > pcmcia-cs binaries. And, if I were to make a new kernel based on > 2.4.18 that I should not expect this problem again since I will be > using the kernel based pcmcia driver libraries?
I just checked to refresh my memory on the problem that you are discussing. If you are using the 2.4 kernel drivers, then you do not need to install (or even build) a pcmcia-modules-2.4.18 package. This is the package that had the conflicts with the kernel-image package. Since you do not need to install it, you should not encounter this problem again. The contents of the pcmcia-cs package should not have conflicted with anything. Therefore, this is not a problem with pcmcia-cs. Those users who prefer the standalone drivers in the pcmcia-modules-* packages will continue to see these conflicts until the kernel packages are fixed to get rid of the symbolic links in the pcmcia subdirectory. If these users build their own custom kernels, they should *disable* the building of the 2.4 kernel drivers when configuring their kernels. This is done by saying "no" to PCMCIA support (i.e., the question about CONFIG_PCMCIA). This question is about the kernel-supplied drivers, and has nothing to do with the standalone drivers provided by the pcmcia-cs source. - Brian