From: "Cassandra Lynette Ludwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Not wishing to start a debate, but just setting some facts straight here
??? Given that Erik's 'facts' were correct, what's not to debate :-) And what's wrong with debate anyway, as long as it doesn't degenerate to flame wars. My experience is that 2.4 support is excellent. It's just a complete pita to configure :-(. In my case, I had to go with a 2.4 kernel because I have an agp video and I needed both XFree 4.x and kernel 2.4 for the agpgart support. The laptop worked just fine in VGA mode with a default potato install, but needed major work to get both video & pcmcia to work at the same time with woody. (iirc, the 2.3 kernels were never intended for prime-time. odd-numbered versions are developers toys) As to Klaas' comments on the Dell Latitude, you're ahead of me. I haven't got apm or acpi to work on my Dell Inspiron 2500 with _any_ kernel. :-( derek
