On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 07:01:26PM -0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 06:28:05PM -0800, Pann McCuaig wrote:
> My source hack sort of works. The problem is that the signature is appended > *before* you start composing (so you can actually edit it), so my toggle > idea in the compose menu doesn't really help so much. You could bind a key or keys to set and unset the signature and then toggle it with that. TBH, I'd be more tempted to solve the problem in the editor than in mutt - it seems easier and more appropriate to me. Either that or come up with a signature that's generally applicable, I guess. > > There is a mutt mailing list BTW, with many mutt gurus responding to > > this sort of question all the time. > Yeah, I had a look there first in the archives, but they didn't seem to > address this particular aspect. I felt I should ask among my "own" > Debianites before crossing over to them. They're more likely to know than us. It's all about cooperation :-) . > test sig You don't want the sig as an attachment - it sshould be part of the body of the message. -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
pgpaNlnKmQz7b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
