>Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Urgh. What about just finding a rawrite that understand vfat and
>> going with vfat in all cases rather than msdos disks ?
>
>I thought about that for a brief moment, but first of all, it's not an
>easy task, and second of all, it ties us to Win95/98, and locks out
>people with FreeDOS[*], OS/2, DR-DOS or even just older flavors of
>MS-DOS/MSWin. None of which support vfat, afaik. It may even fail
>with NT3.x, though I'm not entirely sure about that.
>
>[*] it could be argued that FreeDOS is really the only one we should
>actively support -- not that I'm making such an argument, but some
>might. I'd certainly oppose any plans to *drop* support for FreeDOS,
>though.
Excellent point.
I think we should adopt the new subarch/disk-size directory structure
to work around problems:
disk-1.20/driver##.bin
/rescue##.bin
/base-##.bin
disk-1.44/driver##.bin
/rescue##.bin
/base-##.bin
Thoughts?
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
