On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Juraj Ziegler wrote: > Once again, I replied only to the sender. ;-/ > Any reason, why the list manager sw does not "Reply-To:"?
Many reasons, explained here for example: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html "Good" e-mail clients usually have 3 different reply modes: "private reply" (replies only to sender) "list reply" (replies to the list, and not to the sender) "group reply" (replies to everyone mentionned in the headers) I don't know if it'd be possible to reduce the number of modes to 2 ("reply to sender" and "reply to all") with it still being useful. Either way, changing the Reply-to would be bad because everyone that uses their e-mail program the right way would get confused (as they'd be sending private replies to the list). Between accidently posting to one person, and accidently posting to a list, I'd much rather do the former. Y. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
