Le 12387ième jour après Epoch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: > Since many questions in the debian-laptop list are user oriented > questions, > I thought it would be helpful to the Debian community to ensure the > readers here are aware of the following message I just sent to the > debian-user list. > > RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user
I think that create a d-u-stable and d-u-testing is a good idea for distrib level specific questions, but deactivating d-u is a bad idea. How can people be aware that a question is level specific? I think that d-u is good for general questions. About d-u-unstable, I'm not sure a ML is a good idea. Why not using devel, so close to unstable? And inform non-devel user of the unstable distrib that it is a bad idea to use unstable if they are not aware of the BTS and other tools ? My 2¢. -- The more control, the more that requires control. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
