> > I notisted my kde fonts were somewhat arcaic so I figured out I needed
> > anti-aliasing. The antialiasing-howto deb package had a doc that talked
> > about
> > xfs-xtt
> > but I found (with apt-cache) a xfstt.... They seem somewhat similar...
> > Any clue?
[snip]
> this was a big deal. Now that X4 knows how to honor Freetype on its
> own the normal xfs is probably preferred. However, if you were having
> trouble with that for some reason... perhaps you'd still want it.
[snip]
> But in terms of an external font server optimized for TTFs, yes, they
> both do that.
But... That means I don't even need {xfs-xtt,xfstt} to have anti-aliasing,
and X "alone" will provide the aliased fonts?
In the meanwhile I tryed both xfstt and xfs-xtt and I actually didn't like
the appearence of either of them... I reverted to non-antialised fonts..
I haven't tryed the basic xfs, will it behave differently? Hmmm..
Thank you for your reply!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
