* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021218 07:41]: > also sprach Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.17.0552 +0100]: > > If you or anyone else wants to take my package and add it to the Debian > > archive I would be happy, but for now I'm content with it outside the > > archive. > > I think it would have to be split. > > Then again, how does one cope with the fact that if ACPI is applied, > you'll need a different swsusp patch? Should I be making three > packages in all, then, acpi, swsusp, acpi+swsusp?
Patches have dependency, if you look inside my package you will see that the acpi patch depends on the debian-unacpi patch and that the swsusp patch depends on the acpi patch. When I install the swsusp patch into the kernel with: make-kpkg --added-patches swsusp it will cause all three patches to be applied in the correct order. I don't know if it's really worth it to seperate it to acpi and swsusp patches since the swsusp is tied to the exact acpi patch and is not large so a single package for them is best. But if you package it, it's your decision. Baruch -- Baruch Even http://baruch.ev-en.org/ http://www.nongnu.org/chktex/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
