On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Petro wrote: [Swap] > Actually, as cheap as disk is these days, I'd leave it alone for the > following reasons: > > (1) It's cheap insurance against a runaway process.
How so? If your process is running away, it'll fill your swap, be it 16Mb or 1024Gb... You'd actually be better off with a smaller swap so the process gets killed earlier on... or am I missing something? /Y -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
