Hello Everyone! OK ppl, before we go any further, I did not meant to start a holy war over this 'stable' issue, my question was if 600 MB was enough for me to install debian Potato (which is the version I bought) on my laptop, I won't use it for any type of connection to the 'net nor do I want any spify graphics on it (it's an old Sharp Mebius, Pentium I class). X is cool for now, but I won't install anything that has to do with networks as of now.
So, for now I guess I'm stuck with a set of 3 debian potato CDs which I think it's FAR better than SuZe Linux 6.2 and all the other "bundled" CD's I have gotten off magazines and Unix Unleashed books. I thank you all for your input and I shall consider this my welcoming into the group. Greetz to all from Baja California! ...In Accordance With The Prophecy. Happy Hacking, Bright Blessings and Gentle Breezes! -*/ -= )O( Jay )O( =- /*- ~-----Original Message----- ~From: Derek Broughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:36 AM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: Re: Minimum HD space <SNIP> ~I doubt either of you 'got' it. Woody is not "unstable". Sid ~is "unstable" ~and only for those who are ready to cope with possible badly ~broken code. ~Woody is not yet "stable" (as defined by Debian) but it is ~probably, at this ~point, more _usable_ than Potato, which is too old to work ~with much newer ~hardware. And, Jay, Woody CDs should be available - if not, perhaps, ~directly from Debian. </SNIP> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
