> > >> What a hell is that? :) > > >> It's really funny - someone decided that debian mailing list is the best > > >> place to sprÅÁd a stupid Windows virus! :)
> > >and why not? some people read this mailing list from windows, sometimes... > > >:-) > > Quite a lot, really. > > ... > My stats differ quite a lot: > ... Well, I processed my mail from THIS LIST (debian-laptop) ONLY and here are the results: Number of messages processed: 578 Have X-Mailer: 251 Have User-Agent: 221 Don't have any: 106 (one message - from "martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" at 28 Jan 2002 - contained both. It was counted only once!). mutt 172 outlook 61 mozilla.all 47 (here Netscape<=>Mozilla) Linux - 33 Win - 12 Sun - 2 kmail 40 evolution 39 gnus 26 xfmail 14 exmh 13 sylpheed 10 elm 10 slrn 9 internet_mail 8 eudora 5 lotus_notes 5 www-mail 3 php_imap_webmail 2 forte 2 mulberry 1 mnews(Sun) 1 mailbox_webmail 1 emacs 1 aol 1 compuserve 1 Total 472 As you see "pine" does not include (by default!) any X-Mailer and/or User-Agent stuff! So, I suppose that many of those 106 agents are in fact pine's. Well, Mutt is really popular. The second line is really dissapointing. And I'm a kind of happy about the 3rd one. Actually it would be interesting to read some statistics on the web about this kind of stuff. Normally people talk only about "browser wars". And what about mail agents? I guess there is at least a dozen of agents which do exist but are not in the list above. RS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
