On Tue, 15 May 2001, Matthias Weiss wrote: > > Ahm, unfortunately it didn't help. Here is the output after a startx: Just to be _absolutely_ clear about this - you are aware that the XF86Config file format changed in an incompatible way [for the better, imo] between 3.x and 4.x, right? -- I think my memory is implemented as a dissociative array... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- XF86Config, X 3.3.6, ATI Rage 128 Matthias Weiss
- Re: XF86Config, X 3.3.6, ATI Rage 128 Andreas Schmidt
- Re: XF86Config, X 3.3.6, ATI Rage 128 Matthias Weiss
- Re: XF86Config, X 3.3.6, ATI Rage 128 Vivek Dasmohapatra
- Re: XF86Config, X 3.3.6, ATI Rage 128 Matthias Weiss
- Re: XF86Config, X 3.3.6, ATI Rage 128 Vivek Dasmohapatra