I see.  I guess I just have not run across the programs that need it.
However, I've recompiled pcmcia many times without the link, so that
is not one that needs it.

On Sep 14, christoph hebeisen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 > hi,
 > 
 > many other projects expect the kernel sources in /usr/src/linux - so if
 > you compile e.g. pcmcia or alsa you definitely need the link (or need to
 > call the folder "linux" which is not too good because then you never know
 > which version you have there, at least not at the first sight.
 > 
 > christoph
 > 
 > > This and later message from someone else say to create a symbolic link
 > > to kernel-source-<version>.  Why? AFAIK, it is unnecessary.  (Or, I am
 > > blissfully ignorant of something.)  If the below were modified by
 > > removing the "ln -s" line and changing the "cd linux" to "cd
 > > kernel-source-<version>" it would all work just as well.  No chance of
 > > having a link point at the wrong place, either.
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Christoph Hebeisen                                        Graduate Student
 > Department of Physics                                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 > Simon Fraser University
 > Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6                                  Phone +1 604 291-5924
 > Canada                                               Fax   +1 604 291-3592
 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 > 
 > --  
 > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > 

-- 
Neil L. Roeth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to