Hello Jean-Philippe, Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 19:39 Uhr schrieb Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <jpmeng...@debian.org>: > > > > > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL > Le 26/03/2020 à 19:03, Baptiste Jammet a écrit : > > Bonjour, > > > > Dixit Jean-Philippe MENGUAL, le 26/03/2020 : > >> Voici une mise à jour de page de man. > >> > >> Merci pour vos relectures. > > > > Relecture indépendante de celle de bubu. > > > > Baptiste > > Merci bien, voici le résultat de vos deux retours. > > Amicalement, > Just for information: The man page of free(1) is part of the procps Debian package (procps-ng in most other distributions). Actually the man page translations of procps are provided by GNU TP [1]. I had proposed to maintain the translations there some time ago [2], but even more than six years later, the translated man pages - although now shipped with the latest tarball v3.3.16 - still don't appear anywhere in a distribution package. Even the Debian package, maintained by the procps main developer Craig Small, doesn't ship them. See the appropriating bug reports [3][4][5][6].
How does this affect manpages-l10n? Once the distribution packages of procps(-ng) ship the translations (hopefully soon), we will stop to translate the appropriate man pages here: free.1.po pgrep.1.po pidof.1.po pkill.1.po pmap.1.po procps.1.po ps.1.po pwdx.1.po slabtop.1.po tload.1.po top.1.po uptime.1.po w.1.po watch.1.po openproc.3.po readproc.3.po readproctab.3.po sysctl.conf.5.po sysctl.8.po vmstat.8.po To mention, ps.1 and top.1 are not yet part of the translation template provided by GNU TP, so we need to keep them here a bit longer. But one day we will get rid of the mentioned .po files, irrevocably. [1] http://translationproject.org/domain/procps-ng-man.html [2] https://www.freelists.org/post/procps/Translations-for-man-pages [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953743 [4] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62034 [5] https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/issues/157 [6] https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26133 Best Regards, Mario
