Am 26.02.20 um 20:28 schrieb Mario Blättermann: > I don't know what Tobias plans for the packaging. But I assume there > won't be any binary packages named manpages-l10n-*. The easiest way to > get a proper upgrade path and to avoid confusing the users would be to > split the source package manpages-l10n into binary packages named > manpages-de, manpages-fr, manpages-pl and so on. Generally I would > recommend this way of packaging, also for other distributions. > > And moreover, in that case nothing needs to be changed regarding the > task-l10n-fr dependency, because manpages-fr still exist as such; only > manpages-fr-extra should then appear as a "provides" of manpages-fr. > > Best Regards, > Mario
Hi all, yes, that's exactly the plan for the binary packages. I'm planning to upload the *source* package manpages-l10n, which in turn generated several *binary* packages like manpages-de(-dev), manpages-fr(-dev), manpages-pl(-dev) etc. The handling of manpages-fr-extra should be easy, it will probably become transitional package to ease the upgrade from Debian stable. Regards, Tobias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
