On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 21:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > * cgroups improvements, see 9edad6ea0f1416415f6fe31cc9d1dbc3817803ed > and friends. Is our patch set disabling it still needed, hence?
I don't know. I was meaning to run a benchmark to see what the cost of enabling memory cgroups (but not creating any) is now. The benchmark should probably be something that allocates large amounts of memory, forks and exec's. One of the AIM benchmarks <http://aimbench.sourceforge.net/> might be suitable. Could you try that? > * architectur patches (disabled in series, need check to be > forward ported or dropped): > * bugfix/m68k/ethernat-kconfig.patch > * bugfix/arm64/arm64-add-missing-dts-entry-for-X-Gene-platform.patch > bugfix/arm64/arm64-removed-using-of-the-mask-attribute-in-the-dts.patch > * features/mips/MIPS-Loongson-3-Add-Loongson-LS3A-RS780E-1-way-machi.patch I think these are all still needed, so I've rebased and re-enabled them. Ben. > As it is only heading to exp, will not block on config updates, > but aboves would be nice to clarify before upload. -- Ben Hutchings I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
