> On 22 Dec 2014, at 17:25, Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 20:46 +0100, Sydney Meyer wrote:
>> Hello Ian,
>> 
>> "systemctl status xen.service" gives:
> 
> Thanks. Sadly these logs weren't as informative a I had hoped they would
> be :-/ (In case it's not clear: this is not your fault)
> 
>> root@jessie:/home/sydney# systemctl status xen.service
>> ● xen.service - LSB: Xen daemons
>>   Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/xen)
>>   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2014-12-20 20:42:30 CET; 11s 
>> ago
>>  Process: 4796 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/xen start (code=exited, status=255)
>> 
>> Dec 20 20:42:30 jessie xen[4796]: Starting Xen daemons: xenfs (warning).
>> Dec 20 20:42:30 jessie systemd[1]: xen.service: control process exited, 
>> code=exited status=255
>> Dec 20 20:42:30 jessie systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Xen daemons.
>> Dec 20 20:42:30 jessie systemd[1]: Unit xen.service entered failed state.
> 
> This basically says "it failed", which isn't terribly helpful!
> 
> I think it is complaining because it couldn't mount xenfs, but it
> doesn't say why.
> 
> If you run "/etc/init.d/xen start" from the root command line does it
> say something more informative/useful?

No, it fails and refers to systemctl/journalctl:

root@jessie:/home/sydney# /etc/init.d/xen start
[....] Starting xen (via systemctl): xen.serviceJob for xen.service failed. See 
'systemctl status xen.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
 failed!
> 
> Could you also try running /usr/lib/xen-common/bin/xen-dir
> and /usr/lib/xen-common/bin/xen-toolstack by hand (also as root).

root@jessie:/home/sydney# /usr/lib/xen-common/bin/xen-dir
/usr/lib/xen-4.4

root@jessie:/home/sydney# /usr/lib/xen-common/bin/xen-toolstack
/usr/lib/xen-4.4/bin/xl
> 
>> "journalctl -xn" gives:
>> 
>> root@jessie:/home/sydney# journalctl -xn
>> -- Logs begin at Sat 2014-12-20 20:40:10 CET, end at Sat 2014-12-20 20:42:30 
>> CET. --
>> Dec 20 20:42:27 jessie kernel: hfsplus: unable to find HFS+ superblock
>> Dec 20 20:42:27 jessie kernel: qnx4: no qnx4 filesystem (no root dir).
>> Dec 20 20:42:27 jessie kernel: You didn't specify the type of your ufs 
>> filesystem
>> 
>>                               mount -t ufs -o 
>> ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|ufs2|5xbsd|old|hp|nextstep|nextstep-cd|openstep ...
>> 
>>>>> WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is 
>>>>> ufstype=old
>> Dec 20 20:42:27 jessie kernel: hfs: can't find a HFS filesystem on dev xvda2
>> Dec 20 20:42:27 jessie os-prober[4747]: debug: /dev/xvda5: is active swap
> 
> This made me wonder -- are you doing/installing this in a Xen guest
> (domU)? From other evidence I don't think you are but I should check.

Yes, this particular output is from a Xen DomU with vmx enabled. The Dom0 is 
running Xen 4.4.1 compiled from source on a Debian Linux 3.16.2 Kernel. I have 
also tested this on a VMware Fusion 7 Guest (HW Version 11).
> 
> Assuming you are running this on the dom0/host, have you booted into the
> hypervisor at this point or are you running bare-metal/native? (I
> suspect the latter).

The VM was running "native", i.e. the VM itself didn't boot into hypervisor 
mode.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian.
> 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/ab8f8295-2dfe-4e24-8972-1539e82f2...@gmail.com

Reply via email to