Hi Ian, > On Dec 10, 2014, at 19:05, Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 18:24 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: >> However, I found that it (menuconfig) doesn’t actually affect the real >> configs while doing binary-arch packaging (though it does change >> debian/build/build_armhf_none_armmp-lpae/.config). What I have done >> (while testing) was adding the required configs to the end of >> debian/build/config.armhf_none_armmp-lpae (for temporary packaging test). > > To make them permanent you want to be adding the differences from the > baseline to debian/config/armhf/config*. Most likely to config.armmp > (which is the baseline for armmp-lpae too).
Thanks. But I guess people usually do that after they can be sure what configs should be included? I’m wondering if there would be a way to change the configurations which then leads to incrementally building rather than rebuilt the binary from scratch, which does take a relatively long time :) Or people are just simply “make” the debian kernel rather than doing real packaging while testing? > >> The second question is about adding missing .ko while making initrd. >> Right now, in order to include necessary regulator drivers >> (palmas-regulator.ko etc.) in the initrd, I have to manually add >> the required modules in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules. Is it necessary >> to look into initramfs-tools and make a patch to include the required >> .ko by default? Or there are other preferred ways to solve the >> problem if the OMAP5432 uEVM can be called supported by Debian. > > This is the job or initramfs-tools. v0.118 in sid tries harder to load > things like regulators, clk, phy and pinctrl, what version are you > using? v0.118 is the current version I used, but looks like it doesn’t include the regulator .ko properly on OMAP5432 uEVM unless I told it explicitly... Cheers, Baozi
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
